Skip to content

Old Time Religion: On American Gods

The following passage from Marx’s Grundrisse could serve as a fairly accurate pitch meeting for American Gods: 

Let us take e.g. the relation of Greek art and then of Shakespeare to the present time. It is well known that Greek mythology is not only the arsenal of Greek art but also its foundation. Is the view of nature and of social relations on which the Greek imagination and hence Greek [mythology] is based possible with self-acting mule spindles and railways and locomotives and electrical telegraphs? What chance has Vulcan against Roberts and Co., Jupiter against the lightning-rod and Hermes against the Crédit Mobilier? All mythology overcomes and dominates and shapes the forces of nature in the imagination and by the imagination; it therefore vanishes with the advent of real mastery over them…

From another side: is Achilles possible with powder and lead? Or the Iliad with the printing press, not to mention the printing machine? Do not the song and the saga and the muse necessarily come to an end with the printer’s bar, hence do not the necessary conditions of epic poetry vanish?

The show, which is based on Neil Gaiman’s novel of the same name, concerns the conflict between the “old gods” and the “new gods.” The old gods are the gods of disparate pagan traditions from Odin to Anansi, all brought to this country on slave ships and with indentured servants and immigrants, all in decline, forgotten by the people who once brought them to these shores. The new gods, at least the ones we meet, are Media, World (globalization), and Technology, the new forces that people look to in their despair and aspire to in their desires. As Odin, or Mr. Wednesday as more commonly known as, puts it in Neil Gaiman’s novel, “There are new gods growing in America, clinging to growing knots of belief: gods of credit card and freeway, of Internet and telephone, of radio and hospital and television, gods of plastic and of beeper and of neon. Proud gods, fat and foolish creatures, puffed up with their own newness and importance.”

The explanation of the existence of Gods and their conflict is more Feuerbach than Marx, as the novel makes clear. The gods’ thrive on belief, on prayer, and sacrifice,

“People believe, thought Shadow. It’s what people do. They believe, and then they do not take responsibility for their beliefs; they conjure things, and do not trust the conjuration. People populate the darkness; with ghosts, with gods, with electrons, with tales. People imagine, and people believe; and it is that rock solid belief, that makes things happen.”

American Gods is a literary formulation of the paradox of alienation, to use the term familiar to both Marx and Feuerbach: what people create, what people believe, ends up controlling them. Or, to use a different name for this same process, one closer to the realm of narrative, it is what Yves Citton calls “immanent transcendence,” what is entirely immanent to human existence, desire, fear, and imagination, produces as an effect an image of transcendence, of some instance standing above society, God, the sovereign, the state. The effect then becomes a cause (or what Deleuze and Guattari call a quasi-cause) dictating actions, desires, and beliefs. There is no real surprise as to why writers are drawn to this idea, the notion that stories have power but only if people believe in them has been going on long before Tinkerbell drank the potion, it is an occupational hazard the way the same way that philosophers believe in the power of ideas and architects believe in built structures. Triangles imagine triangular gods and dogs dream of dog gods. This multiplicity, the presence of the immanence in the transcendence, is not something the novel is silent on.

“Have you thought about what it means to be a god? … It means you give up your mortal existence to become a meme: something that lives forever in people’s minds, like the tune of a nursery rhyme. It means that everyone gets to re-create you in their own minds. You barely have your own identity any more. Instead, you’re a thousand aspects of what people need you to be. And everyone wants something different from you. Nothing is fixed, nothing is stable.”

It is at this point that the differences between the novel and the series become relevant. The series sticks to the first few plot points of the novel, the first two episodes are mapped neatly onto the first few chapters of the book. A few episodes in, however, the two diverge, the series is set in the world of the novel but is not an adaptation of its plot, at least word for word. There is an interesting formal question here: the adaptation of novel for film used to be a paring down of extraneous elements, as plots and characters are dropped to fit into a film, but now with television displacing film it becomes a matter of stretching out the premise into something that can sustain indefinite variations. Novels, films, and television series are predicated on different economies of desire and belief, doling out their satisfactions and frustrations differently. The change of form cannot but affect content.

The series greatest departure, at least so far, is how it presents the conflict between the old and the new. In the series the old gods are not just forgotten they are also transformed. As Mad Sweeney, the leprechaun puts it. “I was a king once. Then they made me a bird. Then mother church came along and turned us all into saints and trolls and fairies. General Mills did the rest.” A history not so much of being forgotten but of being retrofitted and reinterpreted. “Whatever exists, having somehow come into being, is again and again reinterpreted to new ends, taken over, transformed and redirected by some power superior to it..” Pop-Nietzscheanism rather than pop-Feuerbach. Ostara lives in a home with dozens of Jesuses (Jesi?) of multiple races and denominations, bunnies, and plates covered with plates and jelly beans.

Along these lines, the new gods do not just want to wipe the old ones out, they want to rebrand them, take some of their power, their name and put it onto new platforms. A goddess of desire is offered a second life on tindr. This is illustrated  most clearly in the case of Vulcan, an old god who has sold out to the new gods. He has gone from the god of fire to firearms, ruling over a company town where cartridges are manufactured.

“You are what you worship. God of the volcano. Those who worship hold a volcano in the palm of their hand. It’s filled with prayers in my name. The power of fire is fire power. Not god, but godlike. And they believe. It fills their spirits every time they pull the trigger. They feel my heat on their hip and it keeps them warm at night.”

As a god of fireams Vulcan is well placed to understand the circularity of belief generating belief, of effects become causes and vice versa. As he explains, “Every bullet fired in a crowded movie theater is a prayer in my name. And that prayer makes them want to pray even harder.” Worship of guns generates worship of guns. The worship and adoration of firearms is an unstable combination of fear and security that seems to partake of something very ancient, even old testament.

It is then appropriate that the title American Gods is indeterminate, suggesting both the melting pot of diverse deities and demigods and the slick new gods of fame and fortune. The novel and series also invoke the heteronomy of americana, of road side attractions and other wayward beliefs, but underneath this plurality there is still the struggle for dominance and hegemony.

I am not going to oversell American Gods, it is yet another entry in the increasing pantheon to which we sacrifice our time, but it does offer an interesting illustration of not so much the paradox of immanent transcendence, but of a temporality in which America appears as  “a motley painting of everything that has ever been believed,” to paraphrase Deleuze and Guattari. The pagan, the monotheistic, and the modern coexist and transform each other. It is not a matter of some metanarrative of progress or decline but temporal overdetermination, of constant reinvention and transformation with the added caveat that reinvention is sometimes just a way for the oldest superstitions to live on.

I will let 3 play us out. It is a good song and I can’t find any decent American Gods clips on Youtube.


Jason Read is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern Maine. He is the author of The Micro-Politics of Capital: Marx and the Prehistory of the Present (SUNY 2003) and The Politics of Transindividuality (Brill 2015/Haymarket 2016). He has published essays on Spinoza, Deleuze, Balibar, Althusser, and The Wire. He blogs at unemployednegativity.com.

8 Comments »

  1. “Along these lines, the new gods do not just want to wipe the old ones out, they want to rebrand them, take some of their power, their name and put it onto new platforms.” Interesting that when I first read this line I thought immediately of Wicca.

    Like

    • Wicca does come to mind, as does the New Age Movement. Also, to be honest, many forms of Neo-((fill-in-the-blank)). But religion/ faith is not static, so why should the gods be?
      Does the god you worship today remain the god you worship yesterday?
      Is tomorrow’s god all that different or someone new?

      Liked by 1 person

  2. On another subject broached by the article. Neil isn’t the first author to posit New Gods. Jack Kirby did it in 1971. As have other authors. Chthulhu, Anyone?
    People seem to create gods all of the time. Gods of need, of desire,gods of wayshowing and exemplary behavior. Who are the gods of Anarchy, of the Anarchist?
    I found a few articles on the Anarchist Library website that point to Taoism but Tao isn’t divine, exactly?
    I am seriously asking this question by the way, who are “our gods” and why worship them?

    Like

    • Tao is definitely divine. The Chinese concept of Tao and some versions of the Christian concept of God aren’t too far away, actually.
      The gods of anarchism: traditionally anarchists, like communists, are atheist. So don’t be surprised that gods and anarchy aren’t often seen together. This said, some modern anarchists are pagans or go for indigenous beliefs of various kinds, as can be seen in this website.
      Who are our gods? That’s the famous question worth all the gold in the world. It’s hard to answer, but an approximation I personally like is this: gods are an interface between people and mysterious forces of nature that are hard to describe and understand.
      Why worship gods? Different people have different reasons. Some worship to feel part of a group of fellow worshipers. Some because it makes them feel better. Some because it helps them remember important things. And some because it allows them to do magic.

      Liked by 2 people

    • The Tao does refer to the mother of the ten thousand things, so it does recognize a creatrix – and then Lao Tzu supposedly ascended to heaven after he wrote the Tao. So there is divinity in the Tao.

      Like

    • It is said that you can tell what a culture worships by the size of their temples. Obviously, Washington D.C. worships political power. Look at the size of the political temples there. What is worshiped in your city?

      Like

      • That’s easy, American Football, Governmental Power, and Money. To whit, the UNL Husker’s Football Stadium, the Nebraska Capitol Building, and the new Pinnacle Bank Arena. Yes, I live in Lincoln, NE. The most interesting of the three is the Capitol Building. It was designed and built by the Masons and has long been reported to have magical, psychic and “other” energies streaming around. It’s also a walloping big testament to Phallic Worship. Seriously, it may be the world’s largest intentionally constructed lingam. In the right lighting, say at Sunset/rise or when lit by pink light (as happened ONLY once during October’s Breast Cancer Awareness one year) it looks like a turgid, fully erect uncut penis and thanks to the statue of the Sower on the top, it’s ejaculating…
        So the city and state I live in has built a testament to 19th Century Western Ideas of Maleness.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: