Skip to content

Why Do You Care About Alex Jones?

Should Alex Jones be on Facebook?

Last week, the company announced that it’s taking down his pages. The reading public will have to go elsewhere to learn about the perils of routine vaccinations and the undoubtedly-many uses of a “latent iodine survival shield.” Now, given his conspiracy theories, homophobia, and more-or-less explicit white nationalism, Jones does not cut a sympathetic figure. But should the Left support his free speech rights anyway, because the same mechanisms that removed Alex Jones are also turned against leftists? Or should anti-fascists rejoice that a hard-right demagogue has lost a platform?

Leftist and social-justice social media’s been arguing the case all week. But, while the debate’s touched on free speech, no-platforming, and the power of tech companies, one question’s been lost in the shuffle:

Why does it matter?

Should we support Facebook’s action? What does “support” even mean? Will commenting on Facebook about the company’s decision change its policies, towards Alex Jones or anyone else? Facebook does as it pleases. The Left can’t change that any more than it can convince Alex Jones that floods aren’t caused by the Air Force.

So, is the issue important? The question’s empty. There are no stakes. There’s no political practice involved other than the discourse itself. It’s isolated from any kind of social power. Does it feel meaningful? Sure, but the feeling is fake – simulated politics. It’s catharsis without the trouble of leaving your front door.


11224307_420831988116596_5406137847644833129_n

Ideas are not political.

Politics is power. It’s about deciding the shape of collective life. Talking about how things should be isn’t political if it’s outside the context of organizing for power. So, neither side of the Jones debate has a political position. After all, is there anything at stake besides whether to type “this is good” or “this is bad” into a comments thread?

Social media platforms seek to maximize their own economic good as individual businesses (by engaging more people for longer, they increase the number of eyes on each ad they sell). Every post you make about whether Facebook should have deleted Alex Jones increases Facebook’s user engagement and, therefore, its profitability. But as they compete for ad revenue, social media companies also maximize the political good of the entire capitalist class: if you scratch your political itch by liking and sharing, you’re that much less likely to feel the need to stir up real-life trouble.

But why should it be either/or? Why not do politics both in person and on social media – can’t you walk and chew gum at the same time?

Well, social media “politics” isn’t zero-impact. The cost goes deeper than emotional exhaustion and wasted time – social media rewards certain styles of interaction. Controversy and hostility lead to more attention and engagement (not to mention favorable treatment from the algorithm!). It’s easy to form endlessly-specific insider cliques, and drama within them just pushes user engagement even higher. So, companies deliberately design their platforms to encourage all that.

In the field, though, that sort of behavior wrecks a fledgling project faster than you can realize it’s happening. I know a self-defense instructor who won’t let trainees directly hand each other the fake gun prop after they practice disarming a shooter – if you do it in practice, you’ll find yourself doing it in real life. The same goes for how you approach other people and form relationships. If you keep handing the algorithm the inflammatory statements and flame wars it loves, you’ll find yourself acting that way when you organize in real life. Social media takes your organizing skills and makes them worse.

You don’t have to take part. You’ll be a better organizer if you don’t.

Talk to your co-workers, your fellow-renters, your co-religionists, and your neighbors. What communities of interest are you part of? Anyone can organize their community but if you don’t do it, how will it happen? Reach out. Find your common interests. Get organized. Take collective action. Serve the people.

And then, when you’re doing real politics, it won’t matter what Facebook thinks.

 


Sophia Burns

is a communist and polytheist in the US Pacific Northwest. Support her on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/marxism_lesbianism


Support our work here.

3 Comments »

  1. Very well put. It certainly crystallized some of my thoughts about Facebook that I was trying to make on Mirna Wabi-Sabi’s article earlier this week better than I could have!

    Like

    • It was and still is clear- but we still write and publish texts, don’t we? Otherwise we wouldn’t have this website or even be having this conversation. Just because we are here doesn’t mean we aren’t also doing things out there with “the people”.

      Like

  2. Happily, not all people on the Left share the conspiracy denial and the “expert consensus” worship that is so easily seen in this text. Understanding it gives me some hope that Left is not fully intellectually hijacked by the mainstream: social rebellion and resistance means nothing if one’s ideas about what is objectively real and valid are still largely defined by the power elites-provided dogmatic beliefs and misinformation. Here are some food for thought for you, from other Left websites that I like as much as yours:

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/01/26/they-arent-all-safe-pharma-is-willing-to-look-unscientific-to-sell-vaccines/

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2010/11/05/the-vaccination-profiteers/

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2007/09/27/the-cdc-vaccines-and-autism/

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/leaked-dnc-emails-confirm-anti-sanders-conspiracy/5538883

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/another-conspiracy-theory-becomes-fact-the-great-oil-market-collapse-is-all-about-crushing-russian-control-over-syria/5482892

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-conspiracy-theory-label-powerful-tool-of-media-disinformation-and-political-discourse/5375968

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/weaponizing-the-term-conspiracy-theory-disinformation-agents-and-the-cia/5524552

    Yet, even despite your inability to really escape from a dominant worldview, your attempts of social liberation are admirable. Socially and politically, I largely support you… even if my positions on many issues of what is actually true and false differs from yours.

    Well, now you’re free to react with all your rage and fury at my links and views.

    P.S. Oh, and just for your information: I do NOT think that the world is controlled by the interdimensional baby-eating Illuminati Freemasonic Lizardmen.

    P.P.S. And I’m NOT Alex Jones fan as well.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: